by Carla Baranauckas
When Chad, a yellow Labrador retriever, moved in with Claire Vaccaro’s family in Manhattan last spring, he already had an important role. As an autism service dog, he was joining the family to help protect Ms. Vaccaro’s 11-year-old son, Milo. Like many companion animals, whether service dogs or pets, Chad had
an immediate effect — the kind of effect that is noticeable but has yet
to be fully understood through scientific study. And it went beyond the
tether that connects dog and boy in public.
“Within, I would say,
a week, I noticed enormous changes,” Ms. Vaccaro said of Milo, whose
autism impairs his ability to communicate and form social bonds. “More
and more changes have happened over the months as their bond has grown.
He’s much calmer. He can concentrate for much longer periods of time.
It’s almost like a cloud has lifted.”
Dr. Melissa A. Nishawala, clinical director of the autism-spectrum service at the Child Study Center at New York University,
said she saw “a prominent and noticeable change” in Milo, even though
the dog just sat quietly in the room. “He started to give me narratives
in a way he never did,” she said, adding that most of them were about
the dog.
The changes have been so profound that Ms. Vaccaro and Dr. Nishawala
are starting to talk about weaning Milo from some of his medication.
Anecdotes
abound on the benefits of companion animals — whether service and
therapy animals or family pets — on human health. But in-depth studies
have been rare. Now the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, part of the National Institutes of Health, is embarking on an effort to study whether these animals can have a tangible effect on children’s well-being.
In partnership with the Waltham Center for Pet Nutrition in England (part of the Mars
candy and pet food company), the child health institute is seeking
proposals that “focus on the interaction between humans and animals.”
In particular, it is looking for studies on how these interactions
affect typical development and health, and whether they have
therapeutic and public-health benefits. It also invites applications
for studies that “address why relationships with pets are more
important to some children than to others” and that “explore the
quality of child-pet relationships, noting variability of human-animal
relationships within a family.”
The national institutes’ interest
in this type of research goes back at least two decades. Valerie
Maholmes, who directs research on child development and behavior at the
children’s health institute, said that at a broad-ranging meeting in
1987 on the health benefits of pets, the N.I.H. “concluded that there
needed to be much more research,” especially on child development.
People
working with animals expect the research to back up their observations.
At Children’s Hospital of Orange County in Southern California, for
instance, dozens of volunteers regularly take their dogs to visit
patients. Children being treated for serious illnesses often have the
blues, anxiety or depression. Animals also become part of the therapeutic program,
especially in the areas involving speech and movement.
“The
human-animal bond bypasses the intellect and goes straight to the heart
and emotions and nurtures us in ways that nothing else can,” said Karin
Winegar, whose book “Saved: Rescued Animals and the Lives They
Transform” (Da Capo, 2008) chronicles human-animal interactions. “We’ve
seen this from coast to coast, whether it’s disabled children at a
riding center in California or a nursing home in Minnesota, where a
woman with Alzheimer’s could not recognize her husband but she could recognize their beloved dog.”
via
http://www.bestfriendnyc.com/
Comments
Post has no comments.